OFX vs QIF vs CSV: Bank Statement Format Comparison Guide

When you export or convert a bank statement, the file format you choose shapes everything that happens next: how smoothly it imports into your accounting software, how much manual cleanup you face, and whether your reconciliation runs in minutes or hours. Yet many accountants and bookkeepers pick a format almost at random, only to discover column-mapping headaches or missing transaction details downstream. This OFX vs QIF vs CSV bank statement format comparison guide is your definitive reference. By the end, you will know exactly what each format contains, where each one excels, and which one to reach for in every common scenario.

What Are OFX, QIF, and CSV?

Before diving into the comparison, let’s establish clear definitions.

OFX (Open Financial Exchange)

OFX is an XML-based open standard designed specifically for electronic exchange of financial data between institutions, servers, and desktop applications. Originally released as version 1.0 using SGML markup, the specification later transitioned to full XML in versions 2.x. The standard is now managed by the Financial Data Exchange (FDX) consortium.

An OFX file wraps every transaction inside structured tags. A single bank transaction, for example, lives inside a <STMTTRN> element that contains child tags for the transaction type (<TRNTYPE>), posting date (<DTPOSTED>), amount (<TRNAMT>), unique identifier (<FITID>), and optional fields like payee name and memo. Because the schema is rigid, any software that reads OFX can predictably extract every data point without guesswork.

Here is a simplified OFX transaction block:

<STMTTRN>
  <TRNTYPE>DEBIT</TRNTYPE>
  <DTPOSTED>20260215120000</DTPOSTED>
  <TRNAMT>-450.00</TRNAMT>
  <FITID>20260215001</FITID>
  <NAME>Office Supplies Inc</NAME>
  <MEMO>Invoice #1042</MEMO>
</STMTTRN>

Key characteristics of OFX:

• Standardized schema enforced by the specification
• Account metadata embedded in the file (routing number, account type, institution ID)
• Balance information included at statement level (opening and closing balances)
• Transaction typing built in (debit, credit, transfer, ATM, POS, etc.)
• Unique transaction IDs (FITID) enabling duplicate detection on import

QIF (Quicken Interchange Format)

QIF is a plain-text, tag-value format originally created by Intuit for its Quicken personal finance software. Each line begins with a single-character tag followed immediately by the value. Transactions are separated by a caret (^) delimiter. Despite its age, QIF remains in circulation because of its simplicity and the large installed base of legacy systems.

A QIF transaction looks like this:

D02/15/2026
T-450.00
POffice Supplies Inc
MInvoice #1042
^

In this example, D is the date, T is the total amount, P is the payee, and M is the memo.

Key characteristics of QIF:

• Simple tag-value structure, one field per line
• Human-readable in any text editor
• Category and class support (the L tag), useful for chart-of-accounts mapping
• No formal standard body managing the specification
• No embedded account identification in most real-world exports
• No unique transaction ID, making duplicate detection unreliable

CSV (Comma-Separated Values)

CSV is a generic tabular text format where each row is a record and columns are delimited by a comma (or semicolon, tab, or pipe, depending on locale and source). CSV has no financial awareness whatsoever; it is simply rows and columns of text.

A CSV bank statement export might look like this:

Date,Description,Amount,Balance
02/15/2026,Office Supplies Inc,-450.00,12350.75
02/15/2026,Client Payment Received,3200.00,15550.75

Key characteristics of CSV:

• No schema: column names, order, and data types vary from source to source
• Universal readability: every spreadsheet application, database, and scripting language can parse CSV
• Easily editable in any text editor or spreadsheet program
• No metadata: no account information, no balance data (unless the source chooses to add columns)
• Encoding pitfalls: character sets (UTF-8 vs. ISO-8859-1), decimal separators, and date formats differ by region

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

The table below provides a side-by-side breakdown across the dimensions that matter most to accountants and bookkeepers.

Feature	OFX	QIF	CSV
Data structure	XML/SGML with nested tags	Flat tag-value pairs	Flat delimited rows
Specification	Open standard (FDX-managed)	Proprietary (Intuit), undocumented	No formal spec (RFC 4180 loosely)
Account metadata	Yes (bank ID, account number, type)	Limited (optional header, rarely used)	No (unless added manually)
Transaction typing	Yes (DEBIT, CREDIT, XFER, ATM, POS…)	No native typing	No native typing
Unique transaction ID	Yes (FITID)	No	No
Balance information	Yes (opening and closing)	No	Sometimes (source-dependent)
Currency support	Yes (ISO currency codes per statement)	No	No (unless column added)
Date format	Fixed: YYYYMMDD	Varies (MM/DD/YYYY typical)	Varies widely by source
Human readability	Low (verbose XML)	High (simple text)	High (tabular text)
File size	Large (XML overhead)	Small	Small to medium
Ease of manual editing	Difficult	Easy	Very easy
Duplicate detection	Built-in via FITID	Not supported	Not supported
Multi-account in one file	Yes	Partially (rarely used in practice)	No
Extensibility	High (XML allows custom tags)	Low (fixed tag set)	Medium (add columns freely)

Software Compatibility Matrix

This second table maps each format against major categories of accounting and bookkeeping software.

Software Category	OFX Support	QIF Support	CSV Support
Desktop accounting (traditional)	Native import	Often supported	Import with mapping
Cloud accounting platforms	Native import (preferred)	Rarely supported	Supported (manual mapping)
Personal finance apps	Widely supported	Legacy support only	Usually supported
Enterprise ERP systems	Supported via modules	Rarely	Supported via mapping/ETL
Spreadsheet applications	Requires conversion	Requires conversion	Native open
Custom scripts / APIs	XML parsing libraries available	Simple text parsing	Trivial to parse
Bank reconciliation tools	Preferred format	Limited	Supported with setup

The trend across the industry is clear: cloud-based platforms strongly prefer OFX (or its close variants QFX and QBO) for automated bank feeds, while CSV serves as the universal fallback for manual imports and ad hoc analysis. QIF is steadily declining and is no longer accepted by several major platforms for primary account types.

---

Need your bank statements in any format? BankStatementLab converts PDF bank statements to Excel, CSV, or JSON — pick the format that fits your workflow. Try it free →

---

Which Format Should You Choose?

The right format depends on your specific workflow. Use the following decision framework to narrow it down.

Choose OFX when:

• You are importing directly into accounting software. OFX files carry account metadata and transaction IDs, allowing the software to match transactions against the correct ledger account and detect duplicates automatically. This makes OFX the gold standard for bank reconciliation workflows.
• You need automated, hands-off imports. Because the schema is predictable, there is no column-mapping step. The software reads the tags and places data in the right fields every time.
• You handle multi-currency transactions. OFX includes ISO currency codes at the statement level, removing ambiguity.
• Accuracy is non-negotiable. The fixed date format (YYYYMMDD), strict decimal handling, and typed transactions minimize the parsing errors that plague less structured formats.

Choose QIF when:

• Your software only accepts QIF. Some legacy desktop applications still require QIF for transaction imports. If that is the only supported format, it remains a valid choice.
• You want to include category mappings in the file. QIF’s L tag lets you pre-assign transactions to chart-of-accounts categories before import, which can save time if your software honors those mappings.
• You are working with a very simple, single-account workflow. For straightforward imports of one account at a time into older software, QIF’s simplicity is adequate.

Choose CSV when:

• You need to review, edit, or transform data before import. CSV is the easiest format to open in a spreadsheet, clean up, add columns, split or merge fields, and re-save. For accountants who need to reclassify transactions or add annotations before importing, CSV is unmatched.
• You are building custom integrations or scripts. Parsing CSV programmatically is trivial in every language. If your workflow involves Python, R, or even Excel Power Query, CSV is the most frictionless input.
• Your accounting software does not support OFX or QFX. Some niche or regional platforms only accept CSV. In those cases, it is your only option for manual import.
• You need to share data with non-technical stakeholders. Anyone can open a CSV file. No specialized viewer is needed.
• You are performing ad hoc analysis. For quick pivots, filters, or visual inspection in a spreadsheet, CSV is the fastest path from bank data to insight.

Quick Decision Table

Your Situation	Recommended Format
Importing into cloud accounting platform	OFX
Automated bank reconciliation	OFX
Manual review before import	CSV
Legacy desktop software (older versions)	QIF
Custom scripting or data pipeline	CSV
Need category pre-mapping in file	QIF
Sharing with colleagues for review	CSV
Multi-currency environment	OFX
Spreadsheet-based analysis	CSV

Common Pitfalls When Working with Bank Statement Formats

Even experienced bookkeepers stumble on these issues. Knowing them in advance saves hours of troubleshooting.

1. Date Format Mismatches in CSV

CSV files carry no metadata about how dates are formatted. A value like 01/02/2026 could mean January 2 or February 1, depending on whether the source uses MM/DD/YYYY or DD/MM/YYYY. When you import a CSV, always verify the date interpretation settings in your accounting software. A single misread date can cascade into an entire month of misaligned transactions.

Mitigation: Before importing, open the CSV and check a few transactions against your bank’s online portal to confirm that dates parse correctly. If they do not, use find-and-replace or a formula in your spreadsheet to reformat the date column into the pattern your software expects.

2. Character Encoding Issues

Bank statement files can arrive in different encodings: UTF-8, ISO-8859-1, Windows-1252, and others. If your software assumes one encoding but the file uses another, special characters (accented letters, currency symbols, non-Latin characters) will display as garbled text or cause import failures.

Mitigation: If you see broken characters after opening a file, re-open it with explicit encoding selection. Most text editors and spreadsheet applications allow you to specify the encoding on open or import.

3. Assuming All OFX Files Are Identical

While OFX is standardized, not all financial institutions implement every optional field. Some OFX exports omit payee names, memo fields, or even transaction types. Others use version 1.x (SGML-based) rather than 2.x (XML-based), and the two have subtle structural differences. Do not assume that an OFX file from one source will have the same richness as one from another.

Mitigation: Open a sample OFX file in a text editor before building any automated import workflow around it. Confirm which fields are populated and handle missing optional fields gracefully in your process.

4. Losing Data Precision in Spreadsheet-Opened CSV

When you double-click a CSV file, your spreadsheet application may auto-detect column types and silently modify data. Long numeric strings (like transaction reference numbers) can be converted to scientific notation. Leading zeros in identifiers get stripped. Date columns may be reformatted to the spreadsheet’s locale.

Mitigation: Always use your spreadsheet’s dedicated “import” or “open as text” function rather than simply double-clicking the file. This gives you explicit control over how each column is interpreted.

5. QIF Duplicate Imports

Because QIF lacks unique transaction identifiers, importing the same file twice typically creates duplicate entries. Unlike OFX, where the FITID allows software to skip already-imported transactions, QIF provides no built-in safeguard.

Mitigation: Track which QIF files you have imported and for which date ranges. Some accounting applications offer a “check for duplicates” step during QIF import, but this relies on heuristic matching (same date, same amount) rather than a definitive ID, so it is not foolproof.

How to Convert Between Formats

In practice, you will often receive bank data in one format and need it in another. Here are practical approaches for the most common conversions.

CSV to OFX

This is the most requested conversion because accountants frequently receive raw CSV exports but need OFX for their accounting software. The conversion requires mapping CSV columns to OFX tags and generating valid XML structure.

• Dedicated conversion tools exist specifically for this purpose and handle the structural transformation, date normalization, and tag generation automatically.
• Scripting approach: If you are comfortable with Python, libraries like ofxtools can generate well-formed OFX files programmatically from any data source, including parsed CSV.
• Key challenge: You will need to supply account metadata (bank ID, account number, account type) that does not exist in the CSV. Most conversion tools prompt you for this information.

OFX to CSV

This conversion is simpler because you are going from a richer format to a simpler one. You are essentially flattening structured XML into a table.

• Open the OFX file in accounting software and export as CSV. Many applications support this path.
• Use an XML parser to extract the <STMTTRN> elements and write the field values into CSV columns.
• Key challenge: Decide which OFX fields to include as CSV columns. Not all fields may be relevant to your use case.

QIF to CSV

QIF’s simple text structure makes it straightforward to convert to CSV.

• Text processing: A short script can read each QIF transaction block (delimited by ^), parse the tag-value pairs, and write them as CSV rows.
• Spreadsheet import: Some spreadsheet applications can open QIF files directly with the right import settings, though this is not universal.
• Key challenge: The QIF date format may need reformatting to match your target system’s expectations.

PDF to Any Format

Many bank statements arrive as PDF files, which are not machine-readable by default. Extracting structured data from a PDF requires OCR (optical character recognition) or intelligent document parsing. Once extracted, the data can be output in whichever format your workflow requires: CSV for flexibility, OFX for direct accounting import, or JSON for API integrations.

This is where a purpose-built tool adds the most value. Rather than manually retyping transactions or wrestling with copy-paste errors, automated extraction handles layout detection, table parsing, and data validation in seconds.

Conversion Best Practices

• Always validate after conversion. Open the output file, spot-check a handful of transactions against the original, and confirm that dates, amounts, and descriptions survived intact.
• Preserve the original file. Never overwrite your source data. Keep the original export alongside the converted version.
• Document your mapping. If you map CSV columns to OFX fields (or vice versa), record which source column maps to which target field. This documentation saves time when you repeat the process next month.

Conclusion

Choosing between OFX, QIF, and CSV is not a trivial decision. Each format carries distinct strengths: OFX delivers structured, metadata-rich data ideal for automated accounting imports and reconciliation. QIF offers a lightweight legacy option with category support for older desktop applications. CSV provides unmatched flexibility for manual review, editing, custom scripting, and universal compatibility.

For most modern accounting workflows, OFX is the preferred format when your software supports it. It eliminates column-mapping guesswork, enables duplicate detection, and carries the account metadata needed for clean reconciliation. When you need to inspect, transform, or share data before it reaches your ledger, CSV is the practical choice. And if you are maintaining a legacy system that demands it, QIF remains serviceable though its relevance continues to narrow.

The format only matters, of course, if the data inside it is accurate. Whether your bank statements arrive as PDFs, scanned images, or electronic exports, getting clean, structured data into the right format is the foundation of efficient bookkeeping.

---

Ready to convert your PDF bank statements into clean, import-ready files? BankStatementLab extracts transactions from PDF bank statements and delivers them in CSV, Excel, or JSON, so you can feed any accounting workflow with confidence. Start your free conversion →